💰 Is pokerstars legit and trustworthy? - Poker Rooms - CardsChat™

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🔥

Filter:
Sort:
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

list.smotri-prikol.fun › Categories › Gambling › Betting Agency.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑 1,165 • Bad

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

So daniel negreanu has left pokerstars and the site is coming under more and more criticism than ever before. I have played on the site for.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

But is PokerStars legit? Is there widespread cheating going on across the entire industry, and specifically at the biggest online poker site in the world, PokerStars​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

There's no questioning that PokerStars is one of the most legitimate poker sites online, even if I don't like them as a player. PokerStars is extremely by-the-book.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Funny suckouts and beats compilation. "Best of the best of the best, Sir!".


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

But is PokerStars legit? Is there widespread cheating going on across the entire industry, and specifically at the biggest online poker site in the world, PokerStars​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

There's no questioning that PokerStars is one of the most legitimate poker sites online, even if I don't like them as a player. PokerStars is extremely by-the-book.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

list.smotri-prikol.fun › Is-PokerStars-a-scam.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

But is PokerStars legit? Is there widespread cheating going on across the entire industry, and specifically at the biggest online poker site in the world, PokerStars​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

🤑

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Funny suckouts and beats compilation. "Best of the best of the best, Sir!".


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments

Way too many bad beats regardless of which side of it you're on. If you win a big tournament, what prevents PokerStars from immediately changing their terms to not pay you out?! On May 1, , PokerStars unilaterally changed the terms to only compensate their marketing partners for only two years. And the losses are so laughable and obvious. Although the company started as a play-money service only, the focus has been on real-money poker for more than a decade. PokerStars was guilty — and when online poker became legalized in New Jersey, Nevada, and Delaware, with the potential of California coming next, some laws had a bad actor clause — which disallowed PokerStars from entering the market since they were illegally operating in the US previously. We feel this choice started PokerStars down a road of shadiness which leads us to our opinion today — that PokerStars is a scam. Its bad enought that its possible to predict that its likely when playing to know almost every time what card will arrive to beat you so they can finish their dodgy tournaments quicker but now money is disappearing from my account its a complete scam. The one statistic , which is so glaring is this one. River cards that have become predictable. I do not believe the site is rigged in regards to cheating because it makes no sense as previously stated by others. If the percentage of winning certain hands is not the same on ps then it must be rigged. I have won 1 of those. Amaya added a 2. In doing so, PokerStars breached the privacy contract with its players. Associating with the owners — the Scheinbergs — prevented PokerStars from entering US markets, which eventually led to the sale of PokerStars to Amaya. The BBB does track international companies, however, and although it has not accredited or rated PokerStars, it does have a file for the company in nearly every state. PokerStars has been in business for over 15 years. In addition, VIP rewards are earned based on the amount staked not the amount won or lost. On May 1, , PokerStars sent an email to its online marketing partners drastically changing the terms of their agreements, causing significant damage to all of their Internet partners for their own benefit. On April 20, the pokerstars. This act made it illegal for PokerStars to accept US players and illegal for US banks to process payments related to online poker. Amaya does not care about the players or the business partners of PokerStars. PokerStars did not fully satisfy these commitments even though they now own and are responsible for the Full Tilt brand. Prior to the seizure, PokerStars could not legally provide service to U. A much bigger concern of whether PokerStars games are rigged is whether the company is actually cheating players out of winnings. Department of Justice in This settlement allowed PokerStars to return to the U. PokerStars did react to this story by providing these studies with more comprehensive data sets to work with. Getting low in stack. PokerStars spends a lot of money on its sponsorships, and it behooves the brand to have these professional players be successful. PokerStars does not want money leaving the system, so players that earn profits and routinely withdraw cash from the site are not good for the site. Keep in mind that PokerStars has no incentive to rig poker games outside of sponsored play. How, and if, a client is favoring players? Therefore, PokerStars has motivation, and the company has chosen to ignore rather than dispute the video evidence. In fact, PokerStars purchased Full Tilt Poker and continues to manage and operate this brand — a brand that is synonymous with the term ponzi scheme. Admittedly, there is some compelling video evidence on YouTube of sponsored PokerStars players beating the odds on multiple occasions during a number of big events. For that reason, it is very difficult to believe that PokerStars would rig games on a regular basis, and there is no concrete proof to suggest that PokerStars has done so. PokerStars is a scam. Same m. After watching my account depleted repeatedly, I started to document my play. And that revenue share plan would persist for the life of the player. There are a significant number of complaints on file, and we urge everyone to check with their local BBB to consider local experiences with the PokerStars brand. The company lost a lot of money and a significant portion of its customer base. What this means is that marketing partners that have been supporting and promoting PokerStars for years and years will lose all revenues from those players. Amaya increased the rake at PokerStars in late ! And this new change of ownership has led to the issues we see today. Rigged or not? All this talking about rigged poker clients. On April 15, , the Department of Justice seized the pokerstars. To this day, countless players and business partners are owed money from Full Tilt. Sorry, but we have to call it. Although user names were stripped, hand logs are publicly available, and it is possible to associate individual players with the released data. Simply put if I can predict all my losses I should not be playing in this medium. To make this a complete and fully good analyze, will be extremely complicated.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} The biggest online poker site in the world at the time, PartyPoker, immediately accepted and followed this new US law, and left the USA market. This was true prior to the UIGEA, and it is true even now in the states where the brand has a legal presence. It would have been way to obvious. It is worth noting that there were at least two independent analyses of the PokerStars dealer mechanism that presented data outside the norm. The revenues that PokerStars earns is based on the total pot no matter who wins it. You start to lose consistently. And is the outcome of this events, isolated, close to what is expected to normal regularity? Then it happens. Pocket deuces. Runner runner everything. The company was one of the driving factors in the meteoric success of its young industry, and always offered strong security measures and customer support. In both alternatives, the big stack seems to be the winner most of the times, no matter what two cards the players have. Over hundreds of hand i had AK hole cards 32 times. Marketing partners of PokerStars had an agreement — that they would receive a certain percentage of the revenues that PokerStars earned off players referred by that partner. We believe that all of these poor decisions stemmed from the fact that PokerStars decided to break US law by continuing to offer their services to Americans. Happens to everyone from time to time. I am amazed that they are operating at all, and have learned to do more research before helping a company profit. Create your own review. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}Since , PokerStars has been among the most prominent online poker brands. Or give Aces or Kings way to often to whatever player, or never? A quick search online will reveal a sharp increase in the last several years of players making complaints about having their accounts seized, bankrolls reduced when making a withdrawal, withdrawals refused, bonuses voided for no reason and so forth. Basically, this is a breach of contract and PokerStars is more than willing to completely screw their partners. I do not believe any clients to be rigged — like that. The most concerning question about PokerStars is whether the service is rigged. Nevertheless, there is incentive to be even more profitable in a highly competitive market, and PokerStars would not be the first online gambling service to increase profits by exploiting consumers. I put money in and easily run it up to 3or 4 times my investment. Favor a player to win — or themselves to get rich? I love the believers who drank the cool aid , who try and spew the same crap. Another point of concern for poker players considering PokerStars is that the company has never received accreditation from the Better Business Bureau. PokerStars turns a profit on every real-money player no matter how much he or she wins. If PokerStars is willing to do this to their business partners, then what are they willing to do to their players? The most egregious act destroying any remaining goodwill PokerStars may have had came very recently. For some, this data was evidence that PokerStars was rigging standard games or at least that the dealer mechanism was not random. The company is located in the Isle of Man and acquired a European Union gambling license through Malta. The nature of online play, however, is that it is more difficult for a pro player to be consistently successful. I could be wrong, but it sure doesn't seem as it plays out that way. Full Tilt Poker had rampant cheating going — and this is a fact. They will only get compensated for players from the past 2 years. And is the outcome of this events, isolated, close to what is expected to be normal regularity? Anyway, to me a mediocre poker experience, but no scam. I do feel the "random card generator" algorithm is not what it should be and does not deliver cards with the percentages over the long hall of a dealer with a shuffle machine. So, I guess the real question to ask when considering if, and how, online poker clients are rigging their platforms, and how to do the correct analyze of all billion hands and maybe getting on step closer be able to? Absolutely terrible, no customer service, they wont even try to help with the smallest issue.. PokerStars had a strong reputation ten years ago, but that all began to change in late when the U.